Category: Award

AccessAward

Nominations Due by December 17th for the 2010 Louis M. Brown Award for Legal Access

JEL23652-Blackford, Sheila P3 (2)  by Sheila Blackford   ©2009  Nominations for the Brown Award for Legal Access are due no later than December 17, 2009. These prestigious awards will be presented during the ABA Midyear Meeting in Orlando, February 3, 2010.

The legal needs of the middle class and those with moderate incomes goes unmet many times due to the cost of legal services. Annually, the Louis M. Brown Award for Legal Access is presented to those who have made creative contributions to the delivery of legal services to the middle class and those of moderate incomes.

Be inspired. Check out the award’s website for ideas that can be replicated for providing legal information, services, and representation. If you are doing something innovative nominate yourself. If you like what someone else is doing, nominate them. Hoping for an Oregon winner! Details here.

My appreciation to Will Hornsby of the ABA for bringing this December 17th deadline for nominations for this award to my attention.

AwardeLawyeringLaw Practice ManagementTechnology

Attention, Innovators Using the Internet to Deliver Legal Services

JEL23652-Blackford, Sheila P3 (2)  by Sheila Blackford   ©2009   The Law Practice Management Section of the American Bar Association awards the James I Keane Memorial Award in Excellence in eLawyering, annually at the ABA TechShow in Chicago. Nominations are now open for the Award to be in March, 2010. Candidates can self-nominate. Full details and requirements of this award can be found here. Do you want to nominate a colleague or yourself, there is an on-line nomination form that can be found here.

A brief summary of the James I. Keane Award criteria:
• The project or law firm must demonstrate the use of the Internet to deliver legal services.
• It must be unique. It should be an on-line legal service that has never been done before, or not quite this way before.
• Absence of precedent – Never been done or done quite this way before.
• There should be some measurable outcome that would indicate that the innovation is accomplishing what it was intended to do.
• Action must have taken place no more than three years prior to this entry, and the legal service must be operating for at least one year prior to submission of the Application.
• Additional consideration will be given to projects that focus on the delivery of legal services to individuals of moderate means.
• The nomination should describe how the service was developed, how it is managed, and how it has been evaluated.
• The nomination should describe how the service can be replicated by other law firms in terms of development costs, required technology, people requirements, and ongoing maintenance costs.